|
Post by Koach on Jul 1, 2008 8:08:44 GMT -6
It was bound to happen eventually. Technology keeps evolving. It is only a matter of time until we have "Robot Brothels" like the ones mentioned in the article below. Between Japanese kissing robots and full-sized "love dolls," it's clear to us that all aspects of technology are barreling toward one inevitable invention: robot hookers.
We're not scientists, so don't ask us any technical questions, but there's one aspect of this phenomenon to which we've given a lot of thought. Is having sex with an ultra-realistic robot hooker cheating? We've considered the issue from every angle, because you want to be prepared when the future arrives.
It's not cheating: A robot hooker is just a machine, so having sex with one is like using a vibrator for women. Purchasing a little robot companionship is perfect because there's no chance of STDs or emotional attachments. My girlfriend should be happy I'm just down at the robot brothel instead of hooking up with flesh-and-blood women at the bar.
It is cheating: With advanced technology, having sex with a robot hooker is too much like really cheating. For all intents and purposes, you're having sex with another woman. Plus, what if you want to buy your own robot hooker and keep her in the closet at home? It's a thin line between robot hooker and robot girlfriend.www.asylum.com/2008/06/25/barroom-debate-is-having-sex-with-a-robot-hooker-cheating/
|
|
|
Post by Koach on Jul 1, 2008 8:13:36 GMT -6
Im going to say no. NO, it is not CHEATING. That doesnt mean your girlfriend/wife won't get mad. I am sure she would be pissed as hell. But bending a robot over and givin it to her doggy is no different than sitting in front of the comp and whacking it to Shyla Stylez. Better yet, its even closer in kin to girls using "sex toys" like vibrators and dildos. Granted its creepy and super-weird compared to the latter, but its still in the same ballpark, i think.
You can hit up Webster's if you want a REAL definition, but I feel as though the REAL meaning of cheating encompasses a bit more than just the act of sex. There emotions that are involved as well.
Until some dude is bringing his robot girlfriend home to meet the parents, i dont think "cheating" is the right word to use. I'd say more like "fucked up and twisted."
|
|
|
Post by AmyLynn on Jul 1, 2008 9:30:51 GMT -6
I am saying yes... I do not understand why anyone would want to pay for sex (whether it be with a person or robot) if you have someone at home that is willing to have sex with you. If you own the robot in your home and the robot does not replace your significant other, then not so much cheating. Also, if you feel you must hide it from your partner then totally cheating.
Comparing a vibrator to a robot hooker is not the same thing. A vibrator will not touch you back or (if we are going way out there in technology) not talking back to you as you have sex with it. And I don't see how you can compare it with watching porn in front of the computer because YOU are touching yourself, not some creepy robot.
|
|
|
Post by Zyren on Jul 1, 2008 10:28:15 GMT -6
What about blow-up dolls? I dont think it should be considered cheating at all...obviously, the partner in the relationship will not be happy with the idea of her husband "banging" a robot when shes not around. But, thats between them. Like the "Its not cheating" description said: Its better to have your husband sex up a robot instead of another woman.
|
|
|
Post by Kono on Jul 1, 2008 10:42:05 GMT -6
Awkward poll to wake up to in the morning... Reminds me of some Chobits junk or something. Fuggin' anime always has robot chix.
Anyways, I don't think it's cheating either. In fact, if you manage to get your partner to not care you could have a 3-some with a mutha'fuggin' robot. How weird would that be?
|
|
|
Post by Zyren on Jul 1, 2008 10:45:11 GMT -6
LOLOLOL!!! That'd be perfect!
|
|
|
Post by Kono on Jul 1, 2008 11:02:09 GMT -6
Maybe we're looking at this the wrong way... We're calling it "Weird" and "unusual", but in the future, sex with robots might be the IN thing. Like... Everyone will be doing it. Each household will have some hawt robot maid to clean for you like some cheap porn and through some crazy "accident" results in you getting it on with her. All the time.
|
|
|
Post by Koach on Jul 1, 2008 11:04:12 GMT -6
We're sittin' on a GOLD MINE!!!
|
|
|
Post by Raenen on Jul 1, 2008 11:44:24 GMT -6
Definitely NOT cheating. This goes back to blow up dolls and the argument that porn is cheating. I don't see how going out and paying for sex with a robot, or paying to have one at home makes a difference. The bottom line is it is intercourse with an inantimate object and in that respect is not "cheating." There are no emotions. In terms of physicality, it's a flipping robot. Enough said.
To say having sex with a robot or a blow up doll for that matter is cheating, is to say jerking off is also cheating. And if that's the case, we've all cheated on every girlfriend we've ever had.
|
|
|
Post by Zyren on Jul 1, 2008 11:48:12 GMT -6
HAHAHAHAHHA SEVERIT! That last part had me ROLLIN!
Personally, I think its a "Bad" idea to have robots to begin with...especially sex-bots. But, then again...if it keeps the man at home, instead of having him run out there and cheat on his wife, then yea. Im ALL for it. But, at the same time, if a man is going to cheat on his wife anyways, then a robot wouldn't stop him from doing it in the first place ><
Im saying it could be a "bad" idea, because uhh...I've seen the Animatrix/Matrix series. And look what happened to them.
|
|
|
Post by llael on Jul 1, 2008 11:49:44 GMT -6
Okay I think yes, anyone who's willing to have sex with someone or something that looks like another human being and can interact with you, is cheating, if you want to have sex with others while in a relationship like that, maybe you shouldn't be in a relationship, however, if my husband wanted that so damn bad, I'd get one for me too then, that's the only way its fair. ;] And the hooker thing is definitely cheating, if its one you buy I can see how you can argue it, but paying to have sex with a robot... that's so much worse than being up front about it, and nagging me till I'm like okay fine whatever get one. It honestly depends on the people in a relationship. Its what they think is okay and they find acceptable. If I had a friend who was married and okay with it I wouldn't look down on their relationship, its just different peoples comfort levels. And as for the threesome, I'd rather my husband want a threesome than a robot alone, I mean, if you think about it, at least then he's fulfilling a fantasy, that you're part of, be happy about that and have fun with it don't pout and make him less happy with you than he probably already is.. Plus I think a lot of girls really wouldn't even mind, or have it in mind themselves and don't speak up. And paying for sex is illegal so wtf? Yeah its cheating lawl.
|
|
|
Post by Sanjitsu on Jul 1, 2008 12:17:14 GMT -6
Lol, first of all I would like to point out that all the girls are arguing "yes" and all the guys are arguing "no" which is just hilarious. I''m arguing "No" it isn't cheating and i'm going to break down why. When your significant other seeks interaction with another human, that means you are an utter failure to satisfy him/her in some shape or form. Whether it be on a sexual level or on an intellectual level, either of which, you have NO clue. Not to mention, if he/she is cheating on you already there is a high probability that he/she will eventually leave you for said person. NOW, will you break up with your husband/boyfreind if you found a rubber vagina under his bed? No. Why not? Because you know there is no way in fuck he's gonna dump you or leave you for a rubber vagina and there is this pride in you that tells you he would still prefer your real vagina as opposed to this fake one. Correct? Yes. Let's move on. You find your husband cheating on you with a hooker, someone he paid for sex. WHy would you get upset? Because it's a human interaction in which he could potentially become attached to this person. Not to mention, it's a direct blow to your pride to know that he would rather pay to have sex with another woman because, you, obviously suck at it. Now, the definite underlying difference between the 2, is that the fake vagina is a TOOL, it provides no sense of security, it is simply a means to sexual pleasure. A hooker, although she/he is a tool, is still a human being and poses a huge threat to your relationship as well as infidelity clauses. A ROBOT that ONLY gives sex, would definitely fall in the "tool" category. There is no "relationship" there will never be "relationship" unless their AI rivals that of Armitage. Which, I doubt would ever happen. The robot is having sex because it is PROGRAMMED to have sex, the same way a dildo is programmed to vibrate. The robot isn't touching you because she WANTS to, it is touching you because that's what it is programmed to do. That's like putting a dildo on a mannequin and then crying infidelity because it "appears" to look human.
I say have at it! Produce these robot hookers and I'll mail order mine that looks like Shu Qi or Eva Mendez!
P.S. There are plenty of robotic machines ALREADY for women that women utilize. "Penis machines" and Sybians can be said to be "robotic" sexual devices. Are you saying those women who use these tools are cheating on their significant other? I, certainly, will not say they are. So how can anyone argue differently for a robotic woman?
|
|
|
Post by Zyren on Jul 1, 2008 12:51:37 GMT -6
Oh S*#@ Nm, thats cheating.
|
|
|
Post by Koach on Jul 1, 2008 13:08:02 GMT -6
i'd hit it
|
|
|
Post by AmyLynn on Jul 1, 2008 13:14:11 GMT -6
I knew it would be guys vs girls on this.
I agree that if your significant other wants to have sex with someone else then something is wrong with your relationship. I think the same can be said if he/she would rather have sex with a robot. You guys keep comparing a robot to a vibrator or fake vagina, but it is not the same thing. A vibrator or fake vagina does not give you the same experience at all as being with a real person. A robot on the other hand is extremely close to a real person. Like said above, the robot is programmed. Which means a person can program that robot to do all sorts of things. If you think this would not cause a strain on a relationship, then you are kidding yourself. If a woman knew her significant other was going out and paying to have sex with a robot instead of enjoying a free time with her, then this would cause alot of self doubt and low self esteem. I don't care who the woman is, you know something is wrong if her man is paying to have sex with a robot. Also, I can see plenty of people getting attached to a robot because it does not come with any of the "added benefits" of having a relationship, such as talking or doing things one does not want to do (watch musicals). Be realistic most relationships are based on a good sex life, if you have a better sex life with a robot, then why should you even be in a relationship with a live person. And the biggy is if he/she is up front about it. If you are lying to your partner and not telling them about paying to have sex with a robot, then you are absolutely cheating. Maybe my definition of cheating is different than yours...but I think if a guy goes out and does something with a woman that he hides from his partner, then in my book, he is cheating. Whether it be, having dinner, going to a movie, kissing, holding hands, sex, etc....
On the other hand, if my husband came home and said, I would like to have a sex robot. I will not use it all the time and it will not replace you, but I am interested and want to try it. Also, there are times you are not here and it would be good to have around. I have no problems with that. He is up front with me about it....not cheating. But, as soon as that nasty thing starts to be used more than me....it is GONE!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Kono on Jul 1, 2008 13:22:48 GMT -6
Don't worry though...
The day we get sex robots is he day that females start to look like anime chicks.
...
|
|
|
Post by Koach on Jul 1, 2008 13:26:35 GMT -6
I foresee problems with this, though. Just going on speculation...but wouldn't you think that a Robot that is designed specifically for sex would actually end up being BETTER than the real thing? Granted, nothing beats a human touch and what not on the emotional level. But just strictly getting the rocks off...wouldnt it eventually turn to robot > girlfriend
Its like...look at it this way. If you like Macaroni and Cheese, right? Say you could choose to eat the Mac and Cheese made by a Jack-of-all-trades cooking machine that does a decent job and cooking anything you want. Pretty good, right? Now imagine if you could eat that...OR eat the Macaroni and Cheese that is made by a machine whose one and only purpose is producing the best macaroni and cheese possible. Which would you be eating every night?
|
|
|
Post by Sanjitsu on Jul 1, 2008 15:06:48 GMT -6
When it comes down to it, if you're in a relationship or a marriage and your significant other purchases a sex tool to replace you...There are problems with your relationship anyway. Moreover, I doubt anyone in a marriage would readily purchase one of these if their significant other pleased them on the regular. But let's get down to brass tax...Women, USE sex against men, we can argue that till our faces turn blue but I don't know how many couples I've met where the girl would readily admit she withholds sex if she's angry. That being said, most guys would deal with it because they don't want to pay for a prostitute because in their minds it's infidelity. However, as you can obviously see, us guys do not view having sex with a robot as a question of infidelity because we merely see it as a tool of which we blow a huge load over :oP Bottom line, don't withhold sex and these tools won't be used ) tee hee
|
|
|
Post by Zyren on Jul 1, 2008 15:12:51 GMT -6
If I can tell a robot to "Taste my blade" and it understands what that means. Then....sorry Samara ;D
|
|
|
Post by Koach on Jul 1, 2008 15:43:47 GMT -6
I wonder if it'd let me give her a Cleveland Steamer...
|
|
|
Post by AmyLynn on Jul 1, 2008 16:42:35 GMT -6
You know, you see in movies and on TV that women withhold sex from men when they are angry. I have yet to meet that woman. I take that back, I know ONE female like that. And I have known a lot of females in my time This was a conversation that was held in my barracks many a times. In a room that slept 40 females, one stated she withheld sex when angry. The other 39 said she could never get enough. I am not that one. ha ha It has usually been the men in the relationship that held back.
|
|
|
Post by Sanjitsu on Jul 1, 2008 17:04:25 GMT -6
WTF?! A man withholding sex?! LIES! )
|
|
|
Post by Koach on Jul 1, 2008 17:20:28 GMT -6
Take the sex...withhold the 20 minutes of cuddling afterward. That's what i say!
|
|
om3ga
Full Member
Posts: 211
|
Post by om3ga on Jul 1, 2008 20:15:48 GMT -6
ok, how about a robo HJ. No talking, no eye contact, just bidness
|
|
|
Post by AmyLynn on Jul 2, 2008 6:44:03 GMT -6
Don't start with me mister or I will withhold sex ha ha
|
|
|
Post by Sanjitsu on Jul 2, 2008 8:36:17 GMT -6
Don't start with me mister or I will withhold sex ha ha LOLOLOL
|
|
om3ga
Full Member
Posts: 211
|
Post by om3ga on Jul 2, 2008 8:46:39 GMT -6
Don't start with me mister or I will withhold sex ha ha you can withhold deez nuuuuutz!
|
|
|
Post by Raenen on Jul 2, 2008 9:21:48 GMT -6
wit"hold" deez nuts. Brilliant.
|
|
|
Post by Sanjitsu on Jul 2, 2008 9:55:16 GMT -6
LMFAOLMFAO
|
|
|
Post by AmyLynn on Jul 2, 2008 10:43:49 GMT -6
Ahhh...I see you make the smart ass comments when you are at work. Just wait til you get home.
|
|